Wednesday 4 November 2026
Independent Broker Reviews & Financial News

Independent broker research

Broker reviews and comparisons, built on one published methodology

We examine regulation, costs, risk disclosures, customer support and education for every broker using the same weighted criteria. Brands commercially related to the publisher are marked.

  • 26brokers reviewed
  • 6weighted scoring categories
  • 0affiliate or registration links

Highest Rated Brokers

Our reviews examine regulation, pricing, account features, customer support and publicly available company information using a consistent evaluation framework. These are the highest scoring reviews; the full list can be filtered and sorted.

All reviews →

IronFX

Reviewed
Editorial score 5.0 out of 5
Regulation
CySEC 125/10, FCA 585561, FSCA FSP 45276, BVI FSC SIBA/L/24/1175
Markets
Currencies, Indices, Commodities, Share CFDs, ETFs, Crypto
Read Review: IronFX

TradingSphere

Reviewed
Editorial score 5.0 out of 5
Regulation
TOB Trading Ltd, FSA Seychelles SD172
Markets
Currencies, Indices, Commodities, Share CFDs, Crypto
Read Review: TradingSphere

Xlence

Reviewed
Editorial score 5.0 out of 5
Regulation
Tradeco Ltd, FSA Seychelles SD029
Markets
Currencies, Indices, Commodities, Share CFDs
Read Review: Xlence

Capital.com

Reviewed
Editorial score 4.9 out of 5
Regulation
FCA 793714, CySEC 319/17 and 463/25, ASIC AFSL 513393, SCB SIA-F245
Markets
Currencies, Indices, Commodities, Share CFDs, ETFs, Crypto, Bonds
Read Review: Capital.com

IronFX Global

Reviewed
Editorial score 4.9 out of 5
Regulation
Notesco I Limited, Marshall Islands registration 120910; no financial regulator
Markets
Currencies, Indices, Commodities, Share CFDs, Crypto
Read Review: IronFX Global

Interactive Brokers

Reviewed
Editorial score 4.7 out of 5
Regulation
SEC/CFTC, FINRA member (US); FCA FRN 208159; CBI C423427; ASIC AFSL 453554
Markets
Currencies, Indices, Commodities, Share CFDs, Real shares, ETFs, Crypto, Bonds
Read Review: Interactive Brokers

Scores for brands the publisher operates are set by the publisher rather than calculated with our methodology, and each of those reviews says so. Every other score comes from our published rubric. CFDs and other leveraged products carry a high risk of losing money rapidly because of leverage, and a majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. A high editorial score reflects disclosure and service quality. It does not make trading safe.

Broker comparisons

Compare two brokers side by side

Choose two brokers to see their scores in every category, regulation by region and the strengths and limitations from each review.

Brokers by Region

The legal entity, services and regulation that apply to a reader depend on where they live. Choose a region to see the broker entities that serve it.

How We Score Brokers

Every broker is assessed using the same documented criteria. Scores are based on publicly available information, direct product research and clearly identified sources.

Any change to the methodology applies to all brokers and is recorded publicly in the change log.

Read the full methodology

29% Regulation and transparency
23% Costs and fee disclosure
18% Risk and consumer information
12% Customer support
12% Education and research
6% Website and user experience

News

Market news and analysis on central banks, currencies, commodities and indices. Analysis is general market commentary, not personalised investment advice.

All news →

Academy

Educational guides that explain how markets and trading products work, including their material risks. Trading is not a reliable source of income.

All guides →